Clinical Data Review — June 2026 VOL. 2

Patient Records Data Quality Report — CHRSD Foundation Free Eye Care Camp
CHRSD Foundation · Clinical Data Review
Camp Date: 22 May 2026 | Report Date: 20 June 2026

Venue: Deora, Tongi (and surrounding areas), Gazipur/Dhaka
Partners: Lunera, Nevronus Systems
Reviewed by: Clinical Data Quality Team
Organization: CHRSD Foundation, 29 Toyenbee Circular Road (5th Floor), Dhaka-1000

01 — Overview

At a Glance

This report presents a comprehensive data quality audit and clinical summary of patient records from the CHRSD Foundation Free Eye Care Camp held at Deora, Tongi on 22 May 2026. The dataset contains 202 patient records covering demographics, contact information, occupation, medical complications, and treatment decisions including dilation and spectacle prescription.

Upon systematic review, 14 categories of data errors were identified across the dataset, ranging from critical gaps (missing NID, phone format issues) to minor formatting inconsistencies. Several records were flagged for manual clinical verification due to age-condition mismatches.

02 — Patient Demographics

Who Are Our Patients?

The patient base is nearly balanced by gender — 100 males (49.5%) and 102 females (50.5%). The largest age cohort is 18–29 years (32.7%), followed closely by 30–44 years (29.2%), reflecting that the clinic primarily serves working-age adults from the surrounding Tongi and Gazipur areas.

Gender Distribution: Female 102 · Male 100

Age Group Distribution:

Age GroupCountPercentage

Under 18 | 24 | 11.9%
18–29 | 66 | 32.7%
30–44 | 59 | 29.2%
45–59 | 51 | 25.2%
60+ | 2 | 1.0%

Mean Age: 33.9 years
Median Age: 33.0 years
Age Range: 11 – 60 years

Patient Origins

The majority of patients reside in Deora, Tongi (137 patients, 67.8%), with secondary clusters from Cherag Ali (Tongi), Abdullahpur, College Gate (Tongi), Ashulia, Gazipura, and Gazipur. This confirms the camp’s primary catchment area is hyper-local — within a 5–7 km radius.

After standardizing camp site names (correcting comma spacing inconsistencies):

City Distribution: Gazipur 179 (88.6%) · Dhaka 23 (11.4%)

Occupation Profile

Employment and Student are the two dominant occupational categories:

OccupationCountPercentageEmployment | 53 | 26.2%
Student | 45 | 22.3%
Business | 20 | 9.9%
Teacher | 20 | 9.9%
Unemployed | 14 | 6.9%
Service | 12 | 5.9%
Retired | 10 | 5.0%
Shopkeeper | 8 | 4.0%
Farmer | 6 | 3.0%
Tailor | 6 | 3.0%
Driver | 4 | 2.0%
Housewife | 4 | 2.0%

03 — Clinical Findings

Medical Complications: What We’re Treating

Refractive Error is the most common presenting complaint (51 patients, 25.2%), followed by Dry Eye (41 patients, 20.3%) and Medication-related visits (32 patients, 15.8%). Together, these three categories account for over 61% of all patient visits.

Medical Conditions — Patient Count (n = 202)

Medical ConditionTotalMaleFemale% of TotalMean AgeAge RangeRefractive Error | 51 | 33 | 18 | 25.2% | 33.2 | 17–59
Dry Eye | 41 | 18 | 23 | 20.3% | 38.1 | 15–60
Medication | 32 | 15 | 17 | 15.8% | 21.2 | 11–56
Eye Infection | 24 | 8 | 16 | 11.9% | 25.8 | 11–39
Presbyopia | 23 | 10 | 13 | 11.4% | 48.8 | 35–59
Cataract | 13 | 6 | 7 | 6.4% | 48.3 | 41–57
Blur Vision | 10 | 6 | 4 | 5.0% | 27.9 | 14–39
Headache | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.5% | 22.0 | 22
CDC+Pterygium | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.5% | 41.0 | 41
High Myopia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.5% | 21.0 | 21
Presbyopia+Refractive Error | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.5% | 44.0 | 44
Diabetic Retinopathy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.5% | 48.0 | 48
Macular Degeneration | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.5% | 53.0 | 53

Condition Breakdown by Gender

Refractive Error shows a notable male skew (33 male vs 18 female)
Dry Eye and Eye Infection are more prevalent among female patients (23F vs 18M for Dry Eye; 16F vs 8M for Eye Infection)
Presbyopia is slightly more common in females (13F vs 10M)
This aligns with broader epidemiological trends observed in South Asian ophthalmology literature

Dilation & Spectacle Prescription

Dilation Performed:

Yes: 90 patients (44.6%)
No: 112 patients (55.4%)

Spectacle Outcome:

Yes (Prescribed): 104 patients (51.5%)
No (Not needed): 91 patients (45.0%)
Referred: 7 patients (3.5%)

Key Clinical Observation: 51.5% of patients were prescribed spectacles, while 45.0% required no spectacle correction. Seven patients (3.5%) were referred onward — typically for high myopia, complex dry eye, or conditions requiring specialist care. Dilation was performed in 44.6% of consultations, consistent with routine eye examination protocols.

Referred Patients Detail